Anything newsworthy. Or newsworthy for being spectacularly un-newsworthy.
Forum rules
RTFA is assumed - do not reply unless you've read the linked article.
-
Vampirial
- Legendary
- Posts:1790
- Joined:16 Mar 2007, 08:54
- Location:Brisbane
Post
by Vampirial » 17 Dec 2009, 05:31
Darwinism at work I guess.
Caught a lite sneeze
Dreamed a little dream
Made my own pretty hate machine
-
Cartollomew
- I has a monocle (Site Admin)
- Posts:8805
- Joined:22 Aug 2006, 12:11
- Location:Perth
Post
by Cartollomew » 17 Dec 2009, 13:59
Satrix wrote:Darwinism at work I guess.
Not to be picky, but the guy made a mistake or committed suicide in a gruesome fashion - that doesn't really qualify him for being banned from the deep end of the gene pool.
Who do you think you are? If you'd stopped winning, you could have been the Biggest Loser, if you gave up, you could have been a Survivor, if you'd stopped reading Orwell, you could have been on Big Brother!
-
Mews
- Legendary
- Posts:2155
- Joined:07 Oct 2007, 19:47
- Location:Melbourne, New Zealand.
Post
by Mews » 17 Dec 2009, 16:21
Cartollomew wrote:Satrix wrote:Darwinism at work I guess.
Not to be picky, but the guy made a mistake or committed suicide in a gruesome fashion - that doesn't really qualify him for being banned from the deep end of the gene pool.
Point out the bit where you're not being picky? (<--- it's a question, note the upwards infliction. Suck my balls Phil)
On topic, bet he was watching porn and just got distracted.
Having an abundance of platonic relationships reminiscent of my man, Mike Plato.
All that's left is a beautiful hour
And it's ours, ours.
The pale blue dot.
-
Philondra
- Legendary
- Posts:3216
- Joined:13 Sep 2007, 17:14
- Location:Tokyo, Japan
Post
by Philondra » 17 Dec 2009, 16:30
Hey, "Can one of the warlocks please summon Gankiest?" is a question no matter *how* much I am expecting only one answer. You can argue how disingenuous of a question it is, but it's a question none-the-less.
-
Cartollomew
- I has a monocle (Site Admin)
- Posts:8805
- Joined:22 Aug 2006, 12:11
- Location:Perth
Post
by Cartollomew » 17 Dec 2009, 16:55
Mews wrote:Point out the bit where you're not being picky? (<--- it's a question, note the upwards infliction. Suck my balls Phil)
On topic, bet he was watching porn and just got distracted.
The bit where I'm not being picky is where I don't see it as being needlessly pedantic, despite the fact my point involves being picky.
Are you being picky with the point I made and prefaced with "Not to be picky..."?
Who do you think you are? If you'd stopped winning, you could have been the Biggest Loser, if you gave up, you could have been a Survivor, if you'd stopped reading Orwell, you could have been on Big Brother!
-
Mews
- Legendary
- Posts:2155
- Joined:07 Oct 2007, 19:47
- Location:Melbourne, New Zealand.
Post
by Mews » 17 Dec 2009, 18:38
Bah *walks away in a huff*
Having an abundance of platonic relationships reminiscent of my man, Mike Plato.
All that's left is a beautiful hour
And it's ours, ours.
The pale blue dot.
-
Vampirial
- Legendary
- Posts:1790
- Joined:16 Mar 2007, 08:54
- Location:Brisbane
Post
by Vampirial » 17 Dec 2009, 19:08
Cartollomew wrote:Satrix wrote:Darwinism at work I guess.
Not to be picky, but the guy made a mistake or committed suicide in a gruesome fashion - that doesn't really qualify him for being banned from the deep end of the gene pool.
Keeping explosives next to food dippings is just silly to me and he deserves not to pass on those genes, hatter agrees too ^-^
Caught a lite sneeze
Dreamed a little dream
Made my own pretty hate machine
