Japanese woman and her baby registration issues

Anything newsworthy. Or newsworthy for being spectacularly un-newsworthy.
Forum rules
RTFA is assumed - do not reply unless you've read the linked article.
Post Reply
User avatar
Philondra
Legendary
Posts:3216
Joined:13 Sep 2007, 17:14
Location:Tokyo, Japan
Japanese woman and her baby registration issues

Post by Philondra » 27 Jan 2009, 14:08

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/ ... 127a2.html

So it turns out that this woman was being abused by her husband, got a restraining order against him, filed for divorce, and got pregnant by a different man during the divorce proceedings. MAybe not the most common thing in the world, but I would be pressured to call it rare.

The problem is Okayama prefecture has a controversion line in its Civil Code saying that all children born within 300 days of divorce must be registered as the child of the divorced parent: in this case, the woman got pregnant from a man other than her husband (remember, the husband was under a restraining order...), and gave birth within that time frame, so now she is suing because the law states that the baby is her ex-husband's -- biology be damned!

User avatar
Johnnyrico
Legendary
Posts:5412
Joined:31 Aug 2007, 13:50

Re: Japanese woman and her baby registration issues

Post by Johnnyrico » 27 Jan 2009, 14:18

This seems appropriate.

Image
Mews wrote:No Rico, it's a rhetorical question.
8?

Post Reply